UNION CITY, California — Democrat Scott Sakakihara and Republican Linda R. Price are competing for California’s 10th Senate District, offering voters different accounts of how state government should respond to the Bay Area’s cost of living and public-service needs.
This report compares their published campaign positions for the November 3, 2026, election. California58 has not independently verified when, where or by what method either candidate personally voted. Union City is an edition serving the district, not an asserted polling location.
Sakakihara: housing, services and civil rights
On his campaign’s issues page, Sakakihara identifies himself as a Union City councilmember, attorney and Navy Reserve officer. He connects affordability to housing construction, renter protections and support for homelessness services, and calls for lower household costs for healthcare, childcare, groceries and energy.
His platform also backs protection for immigrants, LGBTQ+ residents and reproductive rights, alongside support for Medi-Cal and CalFresh. He advocates community policing, emergency preparedness and accountable law enforcement. On technology, he favors innovation with safeguards for workers, consumers and children. His climate agenda emphasizes cleaner power and transportation.
Price: organizational experience and accountable government
Price’s official campaign website emphasizes her work in organizational consulting and leadership education. It describes more than 30 years teaching leadership and management at Bay Area colleges, as well as organizational-development work supporting military branches. That description is not a claim that she served in uniform.
Her stated priorities include safe neighborhoods, quality schools, affordable housing, economic opportunity and government accountability. She presents listening and collaboration across communities as central to her approach. These are campaign commitments; the website’s broad goals do not by themselves establish how a future legislative proposal would be funded or implemented.
A district spanning two counties
The candidates’ websites identify communities in Alameda and Santa Clara counties, including Union City, Fremont, Hayward, Newark, Milpitas, Santa Clara and Sunnyvale, along with parts of San Jose and nearby communities. Readers should distinguish those district connections from evidence of a candidate’s personal voting appearance.
Sources: Sakakihara’s campaign platform; Price’s official campaign website; California58’s certified-candidate directory and source links. Campaign statements are attributed positions, not independently established outcomes.
Help this community newspaper grow
Your support helps build coverage for the people and places this local newspaper serves.
Donate once by card ↗Support Union City News
Choose how to support Union City News:
Credit / Debit Card via StripeChoose an amount from $1. One-time support through the publisher's LINKERNO Stripe account.
Continue with PayPal Continue with ZelleZelle payments go to Vitaly Ataev Troshin. Please verify the recipient in your bank before sending. Availability depends on your bank.
Optional reader support. When possible, add “Union City News” to the payment note. Contributions are not advertised as tax-deductible. Support does not influence editorial decisions.More from Union City News
- Union City Election: Patino Leads District 2 by 146 Votes; Wang, Bajwa Ahead; Measure II Gets 74.74% Yes →
- Union City Updating Parks and Recreation Master Plan for First Time in 25 Years →
- Lazuli Landing Project Will Add 81 Affordable Apartments and Youth Services Space on Mission Boulevard →
- Dyer Street Pavement Work Brings Weekday Detours to Union City Through November →
- Union City’s Utility-Box Mural Program Is Seeking Artists: A Different Opportunity From BART Columns →
COMMUNITY
Comments
Join the California58 conversation. You must be signed in to comment.
Create a free California58 account or sign in with an available social provider.